Sunday, April 7, 2013

Heady Topper

There are only a few beers in my humble opinion that live up to the hype.  Pliny the Elder being one of them and Heady being another.  I had Heady a few years ago and thought is was really good, but not exceptional.  I'm not sure if it is due to their recent brewery ramp up, or due to the fact that the case I received from my friend Shawn was straight from the brewery, but I was blown away by my latest sampling of Heady.  It has an amazing dankness to it, peachy flavors, with waves and waves of hops.  It also blows me away that it is so good from the can.  The warning on the can is absolutely correct, drink it from the can.  I've had it from a glass and from the can and the can wins every time.  I brewed this clone from an online brew shop.  The shop did not give the exact details of the hops, but they said they would "work" with me if I liked the beer.  I didn't use their S-05, but used the actual Conan yeast that I received from a buddy on HBT.  Since I have a 1/2 case left of the real Heady, I was dying to brew this one up.  I brewed this on my full HERMS system and hit all numbers spot on, awesome.

Grains:
13.2# 2-row
.5# c-20
1.3# corn sugar

Hops:
Warrior at 60
Mix of Chinook, Simcoe and Cascade at 15, plus irish moss
Mix of Chinook, Simcoe and Cascade at 10
Mix of Chinook, Simcoe and Cascade at 3
Mix of Chinook, Simcoe and Cascade at 0
Dry Hop Mix of Chinook, Simcoe and Cascade

Results:
6.9g collected at 1057 without corn sugar, 1068 with corn sugar at 7.1g
6.1g post at 1076
Conan yeast
82% efficiency fly sparge
Mashed at 151-153 (target 151)
Ferment at 66, raise to 68.

Forgot to add my brewing salts, darn again.

New Zealand IPA


I really wanted to brew this IPA with all NZ hops.  They have been growing some really interesting varieties lately.  I brewed this as a tandem brew with my Heady Topper clone.  I did a single batch sparge and came up rather short on volume, but hit my target gravities exactly.  I think I rushed the runoff.  My recirculation pump overheated as well so the mash temps were a bit off.  The 1056 took off in a matter of hours and produced a really nice krausen.  The 4 oz dry hop should be tasty.

Grains:
11.5# 2-row
.5# c-20

Hops:
Hop Total: 4 oz pacific jade, 2 oz Moteuka, 2 oz NZ Hallertau
Split as follows:
.5 oz Pacific Jade at 60 (was closer to .8 oz)
3.5 oz mix of Pacific Jade, Motueka, NZ Hallertau
4oz dry hop mix of Pacific Jade, Motueka, NZ Hallertau

Results:
Mashed at 150 (Target 152)
Batch sparged
5.5 collected at 1053
4.7 post boil at 1062
Wyeast 1056
65.8% efficiency
Ferment at 66, raise to 68

Forgot to add my brewing salts, darn.

Thursday, March 28, 2013

15 Minute Cascade Pale Ale


Now that is a hop addition!
With the segmented brewing experiment deemed a total failure I stumbled across a recipe on HBT for a 15 min boil with extract and steeped grains.  It really piqued my interest so I decided to brew it on a weeknight.  Man was it easy.  I haven't made an extract brew in ages.  The simplicity and speed of my brew night was amazing.  I finished it all in under two hours with cleanup.  I brewed with whole fresh cascades from freshops for the first time. If this ends up a being a winner I will certainly add it to my regular pipeline.  6 hr all grain days are becoming harder and harder to come by.  I may experiment with a pliny hop combo or even use some hop extract post boil to kick up the bittering.  This was a really fun brew night.

Grain/Extracts

3lbs Light Pilsen DME
3 lbs Golden Light DME
1 lb C-60 add the grains to the water and steep until the water temp reaches 170 and pull them out.

Hops

Smells super fresh
2.5oz Whole Cascade at 15 min
1oz Whole Cascade at 5 min
.50 oz Whole Cascade at flameout
1oz Whole Cascade dry hop.

2 tsp gypsum

Pre boil gravity 1.053 into 5.375 starting volume before extract addition and steeping
Post boil gravity 1.056
Ferment at 65 with Notty



First time with whole hops, oh my!
The finished product


Wednesday, February 20, 2013

Homebrew Competitions

When I first started brewing I was very hesitant to enter homebrew competitions.  I finally summoned up the courage to enter a local competition with a few extract brews that I thought were decent.  The beers scored well, not award winning by any stretch, but respectable.  I was much more focused on the overall score than the comments.  As my brewing knowledge expanded, the reverse has now occurred.  I am much more interested in the comments than the overall score.



That first score sheet had so many technical terms that it all went over my head.  Now that I know what the judges are talking about, the comments are extremely helpful.  Thankfully, I have kept all of my score sheets over the years and it is really interesting to go back and see flaws in your beer that you can now correct with better process.  I try to enter at least one competition a year.  BJCP judges are very good critics, much more so than your friends who come over and don't want to offend you by telling you your beer isn't that great.








I entered my Dale's Pale Ale, Chocolate Stout and English Cider into the 30th Annual Kansas City Bier Meisters Competition and all scored well, with the English Cider taking 2nd place in the cider category.  I am still awaiting the score sheets so I am anxious to see the comments.  The beers were the best beers I have produced, in my humble opinion.  The 2nd place cider award is "my" first winner.  I put "my" in quotes because the history of the cider is somewhat comical.  My sister actually brewed this batch back on December 30, 2011.  I racked it after a month and put it in the secondary as usual.  However, we ended up selling our house and moving a month later so I had to decide whether to throw it out or throw it in a keg.  I chose to put it in a keg and that keg ended up sitting in a storage locker for 6 months.  A few months later I decided to put the keg in my kegerator and carb it up, not expecting it to be any good.  Much to my surprise, the cider was excellent.  So after almost 14 months of ageing, I entered the cider into the competition and took that 2nd place award.  Funny how things turn out.

Wednesday, February 6, 2013

Segmented Brewing - Citra Amarillo Wheat

This brew was part of my segmented brewing experiment.  I used my single kettle e-BIAB setup with a full volume continuous recirculation run off my Johnson Controls A419 temperature controller.  I created a make-shift thermowell out of thermoplastic tubing and brass barbed connections and snaked the probe through the top of the kettle barbed fitting.  It worked well in testing and during the mash.  I then ran off the wort into a bucket to hold until the sparge was complete on the sister brew that was going through my HERMS system.  Once the mash was complete over there I dumped the wort into the HERMS kettle, sanitized and waited for the next night to boil.  66.8% efficiency, which wasn't that bad considering it was no sparge and the grain had been around a while.  Again, souring is the main enemy of segmented brewing and this one did smell a bit funky when I opened up the kettle before the boil.  There was a lot of foam on top of the wort.  I boiled off an extra 10 minutes before adding my first hop addition to drive it all off.  It smelled fine going into the fermenter so only time will tell.  This was an interesting brewing experience.  Here is my time breakdown:

First night:
Measure water into kettles, measure and crush grain, test and prime pumps = 1hr

Second night:
Heat strike water, mash, mash out, sparge, clean mash tun = 3 hrs

Wednesday night:
Boil, chill, pitch and cleanup = 3 1/2 hrs

Total time was 7 1/2 hours.  I really enjoyed splitting the time over several days so I did not feel rushed or that I was taking time away from the family.  The bonus of two beers in one session is really appealing. 

Grains:
5# 2-row                     6.4 at 1040
5# wheat                     5.4 at 1047
Mash at 149               66.8% Efficiency

Additions:
60 min boil
0.7 oz Citra First sign of boil, around 70 min mark
.65 oz Citra at 20 min
.65 oz Citra at 15 min
1 oz Amarillo at 10 min
1 oz Amarillo at 0 min
1 oz Amarillo Dry Hop 10 days
Notty at 65-68
OG 1047

Water Adjustments (tsp)
.6 Epsom Salt
.102 Chalk

Ca=36
SO4=61
Mg=17
Na=27
Cl=70
Carb=67
Hard=162
Alk=59

Segmented Brewing - All Simcoe IPA

This brew was part of my segmented brewing experiment.  It has become increasingly more difficult to find 6+ hours to brew so I have been reading about splitting the brew day into a mash on one day and a boil the next.  I have also been trying to come up with a plan to brew two separate beers out of my 3 vessel system at the same time.  I recently purchased a third pump and that sealed the deal.  I mashed this all Simcoe IPA in my HERMS system and mashed a sister beer in the boil kettle as an e-Biab mash.  I mashed out both beers for 10 mins at 170 to pasteurize the wort.  I ran off the sister beer wort from the boil kettle into a sanitized bucket, rinsed the boil kettle, sanitized it, and then sparged the IPA as usual.  Once the sparge water was used up I dumped the sister beer from the bucket into the HERMS kettle, sanitized it, and covered it for the night.  This beer sparged as usual into the boil kettle and then I sanitized it and covered it for the night.  Efficiency was 80%, down a tad probably because I rushed the sparge and perhaps some older grain.  The next night I cranked up the boil and added my hops as usual.  Souring is the main enemy in a segmented brew so I will be interested to see if 20 hours is too long to wait between mash and boil.  Some brewers use this method with no issues and some report souring of the beer because lacto gets in the wort as it sits overnight.  We will see.   

10 lbs 2 row                         7.25 at 1.049
1 lb flaked oats                    6.25 at 1.056
.5 lb crystal 60                     80% Efficiency
.5 lb cara-pils

Hop schedule (All Simcoe Hops)
.75 oz @ 60
1 oz @ 20
1 oz @ 10
2 oz @ 1
2 oz Dry Hop for 7-14 days

OG 1.056
Mash at 152

US-05                                  

Vista, CA Water Profile
Water Adjustments (tsp)
Ca=57
.854 Epsom Salt
SO4=136
.825 Baking Soda
Mg=22
.155 Canning Salt
Na=71
1.254 Gypsum
Cl=88
Carb=147
Hard=233

Alk=122

Monday, December 24, 2012

Pliny the Younger

 I received an email from Russian River last week that they would be brewing Pliny the Younger Thursday, December 27th with a planned release at the brew pub the first week of February.  I also received two pounds of my 2012 Amarillo hops that had been back-ordered for a year.  Inspired, I decided to finally make a go at the Younger recipe that I pieced together a few years back but never brewed.  Time presented itself on Christmas Eve, so I went to work.  It was by far the biggest hop schedule I have ever brewed so I decided to use my new hop spider to keep all of the hops contained.  It was also the biggest grain bill I have ever brewed and I was glad to see that my mash tun and herms system could keep up without any problems.  This was a really big beer.  I sampled Younger in 2009 and 2011 and should I not get some this year, at least I will have my own to keep me satisfied, hopefully.

Grains                              Hops                          Results
20# Rahr 2-row               3oz CTZ at 60           1.092 at 7 gallons
1# Carapils                      1oz CTZ at 45           1.104 at 5.9 gallons
2# corn sugar                  1oz Simcoe at 30       70.9 efficiency
                                        3oz Amarillo at 0
                                        2oz Simcoe at 0
Dry Hop Schedule
1.5-2oz total each addition
DH 1-Simcoe, Amarillo, Centennial for one week, remove
DH 2-Amarillo, Centennial for one week, remove
DH 3-Simcoe for one week, remove
DH 4-Simcoe, Amarillo dry hop in keg

US-05, two packets                                       
OG-1.100 target 

Vista, CA Water Profile
Water Adjustments (tsp)
Ca=57
.854 Epsom Salt
SO4=136
.825 Baking Soda
Mg=22
.155 Canning Salt
Na=71
1.254 Gypsum
Cl=88
Carb=147
Hard=233

Alk=122